X-Git-Url: https://adrianiainlam.tk/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=dygraph-layout.js;h=ac1eca0ade8714177782893e333bbf0cf4fb849c;hb=0b9ce4de137db60db2476fe7ee9cc05215612e30;hp=58f169b6b2745da21d315d96e4ab40c89b4f3e1c;hpb=0c5904175568e3ed0bcde8e5578fe31595a03327;p=dygraphs.git diff --git a/dygraph-layout.js b/dygraph-layout.js index 58f169b..ac1eca0 100644 --- a/dygraph-layout.js +++ b/dygraph-layout.js @@ -206,8 +206,6 @@ DygraphLayout._calcYNormal = function(axis, value) { }; DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineCharts = function() { - // add all the rects - this.points = []; // An array to keep track of how many points will be drawn for each set. // This will allow for the canvas renderer to not have to check every point // for every data set since the points are added in order of the sets in @@ -216,25 +214,41 @@ DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineCharts = function() { this.setPointsOffsets = []; var connectSeparated = this.attr_('connectSeparatedPoints'); - for (var setIdx = 0; setIdx < this.datasets.length; ++setIdx) { + // TODO(bhs): these loops are a hot-spot for high-point-count charts. In fact, + // on chrome+linux, they are 6 times more expensive than iterating through the + // points and drawing the lines. The brunt of the cost comes from allocating + // the |point| structures. + var i = 0; + var setIdx; + + // Preallocating the size of points reduces reallocations, and therefore, + // calls to collect garbage. + var totalPoints = 0; + for (setIdx = 0; setIdx < this.datasets.length; ++setIdx) { + totalPoints += this.datasets[setIdx].length; + } + this.points = new Array(totalPoints); + + for (setIdx = 0; setIdx < this.datasets.length; ++setIdx) { + this.setPointsOffsets.push(i); var dataset = this.datasets[setIdx]; var setName = this.setNames[setIdx]; var axis = this.dygraph_.axisPropertiesForSeries(setName); - this.setPointsOffsets.push(this.points.length); - var setPointsLength = 0; - for (var j = 0; j < dataset.length; j++) { var item = dataset[j]; - var xValue = parseFloat(item[0]); - var yValue = parseFloat(item[1]); + var xValue = DygraphLayout.parseFloat_(item[0]); + var yValue = DygraphLayout.parseFloat_(item[1]); // Range from 0-1 where 0 represents left and 1 represents right. var xNormal = (xValue - this.minxval) * this.xscale; // Range from 0-1 where 0 represents top and 1 represents bottom var yNormal = DygraphLayout._calcYNormal(axis, yValue); - var point = { + if (connectSeparated && item[1] === null) { + yValue = null; + } + this.points[i] = { // TODO(danvk): here x: xNormal, y: yNormal, @@ -242,16 +256,26 @@ DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineCharts = function() { yval: yValue, name: setName }; - if (connectSeparated && item[1] === null) { - point.yval = null; - } - this.points.push(point); - setPointsLength += 1; + i++; } - this.setPointsLengths.push(setPointsLength); + this.setPointsLengths.push(i - this.setPointsOffsets[setIdx]); } }; +/** + * Optimized replacement for parseFloat, which was way too slow when almost + * all values were type number, with few edge cases, none of which were strings. + */ +DygraphLayout.parseFloat_ = function(val) { + // parseFloat(null) is NaN + if (val === null) { + return NaN; + } + + // Assume it's a number or NaN. If it's something else, I'll be shocked. + return val; +} + DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineTicks = function() { var i, tick, label, pos; this.xticks = []; @@ -296,13 +320,13 @@ DygraphLayout.prototype.evaluateWithError = function() { var axis = this.dygraph_.axisPropertiesForSeries(setName); for (j = 0; j < dataset.length; j++, i++) { var item = dataset[j]; - var xv = parseFloat(item[0]); - var yv = parseFloat(item[1]); + var xv = DygraphLayout.parseFloat_(item[0]); + var yv = DygraphLayout.parseFloat_(item[1]); if (xv == this.points[i].xval && yv == this.points[i].yval) { - var errorMinus = parseFloat(item[2]); - var errorPlus = parseFloat(item[3]); + var errorMinus = DygraphLayout.parseFloat_(item[2]); + var errorPlus = DygraphLayout.parseFloat_(item[3]); var yv_minus = yv - errorMinus; var yv_plus = yv + errorPlus;